Sunday, December 13, 2009

Ozark Trail Replacement Rainfly



October 18, 2008




Republic For
Alberto Adrianzén M
. (*) The velasquismo can therefore be defined as a "state reform" oligarchic nature, which sought to establish a "new order." In that sense, not born of a "social pact" but on the Conversely, an authoritarian act of force, ie the rupture of an oligarchic regime in crisis, on this basis, the company proposing a deal that can be defined as foundational. This proposal involved the creation of a new basic consensus that incorporated new social quotas and build a new town. Authoritarian nature was what led to velasquismo eventually fail.
can also be described as a "political revolution", understood as the radical separation between political power and property, more specifically the land. This leads, according to Marx, to end exclusion the individual the whole state. In a structure in which power and property (land) are closely linked and that this stems from this, the power of the state is "special concern of a man divorced from the people and their servants" (Marx, 1967 .) The political revolution in that sense, it raises "matters of state affairs of the people", ie it is the state "as general responsibility" of all, destroying privileges that separate the people from the community. In this context, the triumph of Belaunde in 1980 for these new sectors, which were largely those that led to the presidency, should be an expression of a democratizing regime, not restorative, as it was in practice, especially in terms of the economy. The "political revolution" that began velasquismo then continued to be a promise. Thus, in the 1980's, under democratic rule, two themes emerged strongly: on the one hand, political inclusion, in particular, the involvement of this new "people" in public affairs which involved a renewed interaction between parties and citizens, and secondly, the need for a new state to represent them and assume. The failure of political parties to include these new sectors for different reasons (political violence, economic crisis the crisis of the left and APRA, etc.), but also the failure to build a new state inclusive and representative, was to end with the crisis of the political regime (democratic) created in the 80 and the subsequent establishment of an authoritarian regime promise to these marginalized populations, including them and, similarly, represent on the basis of a new covenant (authoritarian) and a new state. No wonder that since the 80's have a "Peruvian people" who, like the Jews wandering in the desert walks (of politics) looking for a leader to fulfill this promise: Belaunde, Barrantes, Garcia, Fujimori, Toledo, etc. . Hence we can stated that one of the major problems in the country is simultaneously creating a new concept (and subject) of the people (represented political majority) and a new state, for the first endowment of a new legitimacy to the new political power (state) that claims to represent. In other words, how to (re) process a re-founding act that is both a time of social and political inclusion (new majority) and the creation of a new democratic state (institutions). Hence, too, that the political cycle velasquismo opened in our country has not ended because the problems and political work which left us this process remains an outstanding issue in the country. Why deny the historical validity velasquismo, as is often little understanding of what has happened and what happens to us today. And the best example of how bad we walk is the sorry spectacle of those days where it is mixed, as in the early 90's, corruption, lamps and "intelligence", "chuponeos" entry, etc. This is a demonstration that we are tied to the past, because then also the tasks still pending.
(*)


http://www.albertoadrianzen.org/






0 comments:

Post a Comment