Santiago de Cali, March 10, 2009
Doctor. Ana Maria Cabrera
Videla.
Professional Risk Manager.
Ministry of Social Protection.
right of petition.
Based on Article 23 of the Constitution and the Decree 01 of 1984 (Code Administrative) I turn to you, in a respectful and courteous to make the following requests:
ARGUMENTS:
Resolution 2346 of 2007 which regulates the practice of occupational medical evaluations and management and content of stories occupational clinics, whose spirit is undeniably good and necessary for the development of occupational health in the country business and also to protect workers' rights, suffers from procedural defects that have prevented their full implementation and compliance actors in the General System of Occupational Hazards, especially those directly involved with responsibilities and duties: Occupational health physicians, IPSSO., EPS and employers, grievances and disagreements of the various stakeholders that led to this resolution, although this effect is under review for more than 15 months, to date, looking fit so it can be adhered to.
Compliance not only creates difficulties in operationalizing the custody of the occupational histories, but will load cost responsibility associated logistical and economic course for doctors, not only in custody, if not carrying out studies and statistical reports on health of workers who are evaluated situations previously warned the DGRP.
Doctors can make the statistical reports and health diagnoses, but costs need not be made by doctors, should be the responsibility of employers are putting the risk to workers and are required monitor and maintain the health of their workers.
The resolution must include provisions governing the conditions under which the contract and not let the free supply and demand for services that are required because these situations create inequality and injustice in the system.
The SGRP. no decisions should be improved with costs charged to doctors, that are not theirs, we are ready and accept the responsibilities characteristic of our work and services assigned to us by the System, provided that each have a payment, and fair pay.
This resolution also opens the door to the EPS. IPSSO to assemble. to provide occupational health services, which goes against the vertical integration that aims to control a monopoly on the provision of health services to the EPS., with IPS. owned and limited to only lend up to 30% of IPS. Own, If the limited health system monopoly is not just legal or in SGRP. enable them to participate in the provision of services.
consider whether provisions of this resolution have to do with our work and affect our fair wage, have the right to comment on it, so we need to know the revised draft resolution prior to penalty to make objections and clarifications to prevent our rights from being injured and taken measurements that can make this resolution applicable to While the SGRP. and all its stakeholders, based on the articles of the Constitution: Article 25. Everyone has the right to decent work and fair., Article 53. Remuneration commensurate with the amount and quality of work. and Section 74. everyone has the right to access public documents, and the law of Oversight Citizen make the following requests:
REQUESTS:
Send the draft Resolution 2347 of 2007 and revised before its enactment.
Establish a reasonable time for review, study and to get to the Risk Management Professionals objections and suggestions.
take into account the observations and recommendations attesting justified applicable resolution, cumplibles and fair.
Sincerely.
Carlos Arturo Rojas Grisales MD. MSO. Overseer
Delegate to the General System of Occupational Hazards.
"For a SGRP. best and fair "
0 comments:
Post a Comment